(CNN) The growing threat of nuclear war has actually gotten little attention in the election project beyond some reasonable stress and anxiety at the idea of Donald Trump‘s finger on the nuclear button. The United States deals with a basic choice about nuclear weapons, the Obama administration is making the incorrect option and neither prospect has actually spoken out versus this wrongheaded policy.
At the United Nations recently, 123 countries voted
to start settlements next year on a brand-new treaty to restrict the ownership of nuclear weapons. Regardless of President Obama’s motivating 2009 promise to look for the security of a world
devoid of nuclear weapons, the United States voted “no” and led the opposition to this treaty.
The next administration has to decline the hazardous idea that nuclear weapons improve our nationwide security and base its policy rather on an understanding that these weapons are, in reality, the best risk to our nationwide survival. The United States can not deactivate unilaterally, however it can supply and sign up with management to the global motion for a treaty to forbid these weapons.
frantically requires a leader with Gorbachev’s vision and guts. Let’s hope that the next president of the United States will be simply that.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/03/opinions/nuclear-disarmament-election-helfand-lederer/index.html