Looking back on Survivor’s most controversial twist

The season’s first-introduced, disenfranchised players were given the opportunity to return to the game … if they could survive on the desolate edge.

Provost admits, “The idea of ​​the Age of Extension came up with a bit of a fuss.” That’s it In 201. Creative Air is a part of the package we send. We want to see this kind of idea as a gift rather than a risk.

The twist has proven controversial, but ultimately important Chris Underwood Come back from the edge to win the game.

“The extinction was very exciting for every section of our team because it challenged us in so many new ways,” Probst explained. “It was a whole new world from a creative, aesthetic and cinematic perspective. We all just went for it!”

While many fans weren’t thrilled to bring the extinction margin back for the season0 season, Probst revealed that it’s an essential tool for bringing back the 20 former winners.

“I felt like when we called the winners, if they thought it was one and out – I voted and I finished” – they weren’t as likely to say yes if I said ‘whatever, another shot of yours at the prize. There will be, ” he said That’s it Last year.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button